Twitter is full of clowns, fakes & posters (“CFP’s”) that some – even well followed & good people (such as a former trader & risk manager from $GS who posts regularly) – get punk’d by. One such CFP example is @HedgeStrategy. We misstepped & Reco’d this account before, however, we correct the mistake – admitted a wrong – and retracted the Reco with an “Unfollow + Why.” It seems many have forgotten the “why” but as Joe builds yet another of his “1,000%, 5,000% up to 20,000% position size hoax trades,” it’s a good time to revisit why we took such action over 1 year ago.
THE PROBLEM: OVERREACHING & HAVING NO CONCEPT OF RISK MANAGEMENT (wanting to make a “statement”)
Consider the following: At various times, @HedgeStrategy takes VERY concentrated, HIGH CONVICTION positions & there’s nothing wrong with that …. so long as you define risk, right? Step #1, check his stream & try to find even the hint of a STOP (defined RISK). Nope. Negative. Troublesome. Next, have you ever actually taken a pencil to what a “1,000%, 5,000% or 20,000% sized position” would mean relative to a REAL MONEY portfolio? If you have, you’ve already clicked this CFP’s “unfollow” button but for those of you “captivated by the conviction,” let’s actually check the AUM “tail of the tape.” This is where things really go rogue.
THE BREAKDOWN
*Presume Total AUM = 100% or $10,000,000.
*Presume Total FUTURES or CURRENCY Allocation of Total AUM = 10% or $1,000,000. Joe “allegedly” runs a Long, Short, Market Neutral Hedge Fund and invests across asset class including but not limited to – depending on charter – equity, options, debt, futures, currency, horses, lamps, glass blown dildos & all sorts of other “exotic instruments.” In all cases, the “Futures and/or Currency” allocations – as they’re levered trading instruments carrying HIGH RISK – is going to get just a small cut of the Total AUM.
*Basic Math: A total “all in,” 100% sized FUTURES or CURRENCY trade = 10% of Total AUM or a $1,000,000 trade putting 10% of the Total AUM at risk …. HOWEVER;
What happens when you GOOSE a total “all in,” 100% sized FUTURES or CURRENCY position or 10% of Total AUM ($1,000,000 out of your Total AUM of $10,000,000) up to a 1,000% trade size?
*WHAT HAPPENS IS YOU GET 100% OF TOTAL AUM (10% total Futures or Currency AUM x 1000% position size = 100% of TOTAL AUM) IN THE ENTIRE FUND, ON MARGIN, ON LEVERAGE BAKED INTO ONE FUCKING TRADE …. also known as “a hoax.”
A BETTER WAY
We’re not financial advisers or brokers or Estate planners & everyone has to manage + allocate their AUM in a way that suits their risk tolerance, age, personal situation, etc. Many of you – who manage outside money, which we do NOT – must take into account Sharpe Ratio & the like (my buddy @MicroFundy wrote a great article on this) but I can assure you, as the day is long, that NO real world money manager, trader, HF or PM ever has 100% of their Total AUM in ONE trade and if you find someone @ the Bar or Hockey Arena or in an Airport or, certainly, on Twitter who says they are, well folks, that there is the “mark” of a liar, a loser & a no asset having chimp ……… and that’s the bottom line.
Look, maybe guys like @reformedbroker who can go on “Fast Money” and scoff at a 56% misstep SS: $NFLX from October & laugh have the game all figured out but FOR THE REST OF YOU, REAL MONEY TRADING FOLKS, you know that with real money on the line you can’t “afford” even properly allocated trades hitting you for -56%. Our plight is simple; we run real money. We use STOPS. We define thesis along with scale entry range, target basis & price objectives like ALL PM’s who run real assets. We can’t tolerate -56% losses. We can’t take a @HedgeStrategy “all in, 100% of my Total AUM Fund value” in one trade because we manage risk & allocate assets properly. If you want to stay in the game, you should too!
Interested in seeing what asset allocation looks like on $10,000,000 trading across just four products; Real Estate, Equity, Options & Futures?
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1JDKIrk9pVJqjUgG8kzdeJUU2FJowS12hYUjw0cB0-SY/edit
REAL MONEY, REAL TIME:
We are presently SWING SS: a 62.5% position in $ES_F @ 1471.25. The trade is down. We trade with (as posted above) 12% of our Total AUM in our SWING Futures account, meaning IF we were to take our SWING SS: $ES_F position to 100% size (currently @ 62.5%) and LOSE 100% on the trade (there is no way, with a noted STOP, we’d lose 100% in any trade but we’ll humor you with the basic math) our Total AUM would suffer a draw down of 12%, however, if you’re running one of Joe’s Hoaxes at 1,000% size & the trade got clipped, well, you’re pretend Fund, like his, would be at $0.
For the past 18 months, I have appreciated your market insight, commentary and impact. For that, I thank you. I have enjoyed our mutually respectful interaction. I always learned something. Having been involved in the professional finance world for 27 years, I have lived with the necessary personal attributes of market precision and financial accountability. I am very proud of the long term relationships that I have been built on the rock solid foundation of personal trust. Over the course of my time on Twitter, I have tried to genuinely contribute to the real time discovery of both current and historical market relevant information. I have been excited to be a part of the new frontier of Social Finance.
Every day, I interact with dozens of followers on Twitter. No two are the same. I realize that every investor has a different combination of: expertise, experience and interest. My ambition is to be able to have some level of conversation that “helps” them in a small way and reserve judgment. I have never found the global investment landscape more challenging or difficult. I can appreciate frustration and anxiety as well as the great opportunity for all of us.
I read your comments last night with great interest. I noted that you used the term (sadly) in reference to my association with Joe (@HedgeStrategy. As you know, I am fully aware of the natural and exact connection between a “penny” of market position (futures or cash) and the appropriate volatility generated market risk. It is the “undeniable truth” in our daily market life and has serious and immediate consequences. Knowing all of that, I always felt that my public and private interactions with Joe were always on a personal level, never specifically about “the market”. Of course, I take full responsibility for my association and the various implications.
Months ago, when we spoke about the unfolding “uneven and bumpy development” of Social Finance, we agreed that it was going to take a long time for the majority of participants to learn how to engage and contribute effectively. I am sure there will never be a “right answer”. Over the past 18 months, I have tried to play a small role in the development of the very exciting new world of Social Finance.
Thanks for your time,
Buddy Carter
Rumson, NJ
- We have spoken & we thank you for both your contributions to Social Media + your comments here.
- We agree; Social Media & Trading will & is unfolding in an “uneven & bumpy” fashion. Further, it will take a long time for the majority of participants to learn how to engage + contribute effectively & that there will never be a “right answer.”
- Although there will never be a “right answer,” our opinion is that commending people who re-post other people’s work + pretend trades with no risk parameters in place (@fitzstock2004 – who lifts material from the OptionMonster paid site), or size that no HF manager or PM would ever take (@HedgeStrategy – as noted in our post), or who have SEC, FBI and/or NASD-R issues (@upsidetrader – see his history @ The Boston Group, May Davis Group, Cornell Capital, YA Advisors, etc) or those who offer up nothing more than vague, no value posts like “9 longs, 8 shorts” (Keith McCullough) is EXACTLY WHY THE TIME LINE “for the majority of participants to learn how to engage and contribute effectively” IS SO LONG.
- When folks start putting “personal & popular” aside & start focusing on “substance & merit of one’s body of work,” just as all of us real money traders must do as it relates to our PnL’s, Social Media & Trading WILL IMPROVE.
I appreciate your response and fully agree on the need for more genuine “motive and content”. Artificial signals sent through the system distort the quality of the output, hence the value. I have always found hardship and resistance to be a greater tool for
actual learning and progress.
Best,
buddy